We researched and compared seven running board options designed for the Jeep Gladiator, evaluating them against manufacturer specifications, industry safety standards, and aggregated owner feedback from automotive forums and retailer reviews. Running boards serve both functional and aesthetic purposes on the Gladiator, improving entry and exit while protecting the vehicle’s lower body from road debris.
Our evaluation focused on build quality, installation complexity, compatibility with factory hardware, weight capacity, and real-world durability reports from owners who have installed these products on their trucks.
| Photo | Product | Score | Buy |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Go Industries Nerf Bars Top Pick 1.75-inch diameter tube, 500-pound weight capacity per side, powder-coated steel construction |
9.4 | 🛒 Check Price |
 |
Ranch Hand Running Boards Premium Build Heavy-duty steel construction, 600-pound capacity, textured non-slip surface |
9.1 | 🛒 Check Price |
 |
ACI Running Boards Value Pick Aluminum construction, 450-pound capacity, factory-match finish options |
8.8 | 🛒 Check Price |
 |
Westin EZ Step Running Boards Lightweight Option Aluminum with stainless steel hardware, 400-pound capacity, patent-pending step design |
8.5 | 🛒 Check Price |
|
🚗
|
Bushwacker OE-Style Running Boards Factory Integration Molded composite with steel reinforcement, 425-pound capacity, OEM-style appearance |
8.2 | 🛒 Check Price |
|
Lund Grip Step Running Boards Safety Focused Aluminum frame with polymer grip surface, 475-pound capacity, enhanced traction design |
8.0 | 🛒 Check Price |
 |
Amp Research PowerStep Motorized Step Motorized extendable step, aluminum construction, automatic deployment with door opening |
7.7 | 🛒 Check Price |
1. Go Industries Nerf Bars: Top Pick
In our evaluation, the Go Industries Nerf Bars emerged as the most consistently praised option across owner feedback and manufacturer specifications. The 1.75-inch diameter tubing provides structural rigidity while the powder-coated finish has demonstrated corrosion resistance in published durability assessments. Based on owner reports across automotive forums, these bars maintain their appearance and functionality through multiple seasons of use, though some owners in high-salt environments report minor surface oxidation that does not compromise structural integrity.
These bars are ideal for owners seeking a balance of safety, durability, and straightforward installation. However, owners who prioritize lightweight construction for towing performance should consider aluminum alternatives, as the steel construction adds approximately 15-20 pounds per side compared to comparable aluminum options.
- Engineered with side-impact protection and mounting brackets that use factory attachment points
- Slip-resistant tread surface designed to maintain grip in wet conditions
- Accommodates factory Gladiator body lines without requiring cutting or major modifications
Pros: Extensive owner feedback confirms minimal rust development after 2+ years of use; Installation aligns with OEM mounting locations, reducing fitment issues
Cons: Slightly heavier than aluminum alternatives, which may affect fuel economy marginally
2. Ranch Hand Running Boards: Premium Build
Ranch Hand’s offering represents a premium approach to running board design, with emphasis on structural robustness and surface treatment. We compared their specifications against industry standards for side-impact protection and found the reinforced mounting system exceeds baseline requirements. Owner feedback from truck forums consistently highlights the durability of the textured surface, which resists wear better than standard powder-coated options and maintains grip even in muddy or wet conditions.
This option suits owners who prioritize maximum durability and are willing to invest in premium construction. Buyers on strict budgets or those seeking lighter-weight solutions should explore other options, as Ranch Hand’s emphasis on heavy-duty materials results in one of the heavier options in this comparison.
- Integrated side protection with reinforced mounting brackets rated for impact absorption
- Textured coating provides superior grip compared to standard powder coat finishes
- Compatible with factory door handles and does not interfere with door operation
Pros: Owner feedback indicates excellent longevity in extreme weather conditions; Heavy-duty design supports larger body weights and provides confidence during entry and exit
Cons: Premium positioning reflects higher cost relative to comparable alternatives
3. ACI Running Boards: Value Pick
ACI’s aluminum running boards offer a practical middle ground between budget options and premium steel offerings. Based on our research of manufacturer specifications and owner feedback, the aluminum construction provides adequate durability for typical truck use while reducing vehicle weight. We compared corrosion resistance data and found aluminum performs well in most climates, though owners in extreme salt-exposure areas report occasional surface discoloration that does not affect structural integrity.
These boards work well for owners prioritizing lightweight construction and aesthetic integration with factory finishes. However, owners who regularly transport heavy equipment, passengers, or require maximum load capacity should choose steel alternatives with higher weight ratings.
- Lightweight aluminum design reduces overall vehicle weight compared to steel alternatives
- Finish options match factory Gladiator colors, maintaining aesthetic integration
- Straightforward bolt-on installation using existing frame attachment points
Pros: Owner reports indicate minimal installation complications across different Gladiator model years; Aluminum construction resists rust development in coastal and high-humidity environments
Cons: Lower weight capacity than steel options may not suit owners carrying heavy loads or multiple passengers
4. Westin EZ Step Running Boards: Lightweight Option
We evaluated the Westin EZ Step against industry standards for running board design and found the wider step surface represents a thoughtful ergonomic improvement. Owner feedback from Gladiator forums indicates the broader platform provides better foot placement confidence, particularly for shorter occupants or those with mobility considerations. However, in our comparison of mounting system rigidity, some owners report minor rattling sounds after extended use, suggesting the mounting design may benefit from additional bracing or tighter tolerances.
This option suits owners prioritizing comfort and lightweight construction for daily use. Owners requiring maximum load capacity, those frequently transporting multiple heavy passengers, or those in vehicles subjected to rough terrain should consider heavier-duty alternatives with more durable mounting systems.
- Designed with a wider step surface intended to improve foot placement comfort during entry and exit
- Aluminum tubing with stainless fasteners reduces maintenance requirements
- Compact profile minimizes ground clearance impact on approach angles
Pros: Owner feedback highlights the wider step surface as more comfortable than standard round tubing; Lightweight construction appeals to owners concerned with fuel efficiency
Cons: Lower weight capacity and reports of occasional rattling at mounting points suggest less rigid mounting than competitors
5. Bushwacker OE-Style Running Boards: Factory Integration
Bushwacker’s OE-Style offering prioritizes visual integration with the factory Gladiator design. In our evaluation of manufacturer specifications and owner feedback, the composite construction with steel reinforcement provides adequate strength for typical use while maintaining a factory appearance. However, we identified a notable limitation in durability: owner reports from cold-climate regions indicate the composite material can develop surface cracks when exposed to extreme temperature cycling, particularly in areas with harsh winters and intense summer heat.
This option works well for owners prioritizing factory aesthetics and ease of installation. Owners in extreme climate zones, those seeking maximum durability, or those planning to keep their Gladiator for extended periods should choose all-metal alternatives that better withstand temperature stress.
- Designed to match factory Gladiator aesthetic with minimal visual modification
- Molded composite material reduces weight while steel reinforcement provides structural support
- Installation uses factory-location mounting points without requiring frame drilling
Pros: Owner feedback confirms smooth visual integration with factory body lines; Composite material resists rust and requires minimal maintenance
Cons: Composite construction shows more visible wear over time compared to all-metal alternatives, with some owners reporting surface cracking after extended use in extreme temperature variations
6. Lund Grip Step Running Boards: Safety Focused
Lund’s Grip Step design emphasizes traction and safety through its specialized polymer surface. We compared the grip properties against published industry standards for slip resistance and found the texture meets or exceeds baseline safety requirements. Owner feedback from northern climates confirms the enhanced traction provides noticeable improvement during winter entry and exit. However, we identified an important limitation: the polymer coating requires regular cleaning to maintain its grip properties, and owners who do not maintain this coating report that it becomes slippery when dirty or algae-covered, negating the safety advantage.
This option suits owners in cold or wet climates who commit to regular maintenance of the polymer surface. Owners in dry climates, those seeking minimal maintenance requirements, or those who do not regularly clean their vehicles should consider alternatives with more passive grip properties that do not depend on maintenance.
- Textured polymer surface engineered for maximum grip in wet, muddy, or icy conditions
- Aluminum construction keeps weight reasonable while polymer coating protects against corrosion
- Curved design follows body contours for visual continuity
Pros: Owner feedback emphasizes superior traction compared to standard metal finishes in winter conditions; Polymer coating provides long-term protection against salt and moisture exposure
Cons: Polymer surface coating can degrade and become slippery if not regularly cleaned, reducing the safety advantage that justifies the design
7. Amp Research PowerStep: Motorized Step
Amp Research’s PowerStep represents a technology-focused approach to running board functionality through motorized automation. We evaluated the motorized mechanism against published reliability data and identified a significant concern: the electrical and mechanical complexity introduces multiple potential failure points. Owner feedback from Gladiator forums includes reports of motor failures, intermittent deployment issues, and electrical gremlins that require dealer-level diagnostics and repair, creating maintenance costs and downtime that offset the convenience benefit for many owners.
This option suits owners who prioritize convenience and have access to reliable dealer service for electrical repairs, or those with mobility challenges who benefit from the assisted entry. Owners seeking maximum reliability, those uncomfortable with motorized components, those on limited service budgets, or those regularly towing or carrying heavy loads should choose passive alternatives, as the significantly lower weight capacity and higher failure risk make this a poor choice for demanding use.
- Powered mechanism extends automatically when driver door opens and retracts when door closes
- Aluminum construction with stainless hardware rated for 300-pound capacity per step
- Integrated control module interfaces with factory door switches
Pros: Owner feedback highlights convenience of automatic deployment for daily use; Motorized design provides assistance for elderly or mobility-limited occupants
Cons: Motorized mechanism introduces complexity and potential failure points, with owner reports of motor malfunction and electrical issues requiring dealer service, and the 300-pound capacity is significantly lower than passive alternatives
Frequently Asked Questions
Do running boards affect the Jeep Gladiator's approach and departure angles?
Based on our research of manufacturer specifications, most running boards add minimal impact to approach angles when designed specifically for the Gladiator. Compact designs like the Westin EZ Step minimize ground clearance reduction, while heavier-profile options like Ranch Hand may reduce approach angles by 1-2 degrees. For owners regularly traversing steep terrain or rock crawling, we recommend checking the specific product’s angle specifications before purchase. Standard on-road and light off-road use is not significantly affected by most running board designs.
Can running boards be installed on a Gladiator with a tonneau cover or bed cover?
In our evaluation of compatibility, most running boards install without interference from tonneau covers or soft bed covers. However, some hard tonneau covers may limit access to mounting points or create fitment issues. We recommend verifying compatibility between your specific bed cover model and running board before purchase. The Go Industries and Ranch Hand options have the most documented compatibility across popular tonneau cover brands based on owner feedback.
What is the difference between nerf bars and running boards?
While the terms are often used interchangeably, our research found that nerf bars typically feature smaller diameter tubing (1.25-1.5 inches) designed primarily for side-impact protection, while running boards emphasize a wider step surface for foot placement during entry and exit. Running boards generally offer larger step areas and higher weight capacities. The Go Industries and Westin options in this comparison are true running boards with emphasized step surfaces, while Ranch Hand and Bushwacker offer hybrid designs combining protection and stepping functionality.
How do I prevent running boards from rusting?
Based on manufacturer recommendations and owner feedback, steel running boards like the Go Industries and Ranch Hand benefit from periodic cleaning and inspection, particularly in salt-exposure environments. Applying automotive wax or clear protective coatings can extend the powder-coat finish lifespan. Aluminum options like ACI and Westin naturally resist rust but may develop white oxidation that can be addressed with aluminum polish. Most owners report minimal rust development with standard care, though high-salt or coastal environments require more frequent maintenance.
Are running boards difficult to install on a Jeep Gladiator?
In our evaluation of installation complexity based on owner feedback and manufacturer documentation, most running boards designed for the Gladiator use factory attachment points and require basic hand tools. Installation typically takes 1-2 hours for DIY owners with moderate mechanical experience. The ACI and Bushwacker options are frequently cited as straightforward bolt-on installations, while the Amp Research PowerStep requires electrical integration and is more complex. Professional installation is available through Jeep dealers and specialty shops if preferred.
Our Verdict
After researching and comparing seven running board options against manufacturer specifications, industry safety standards, and aggregated owner feedback, the Go Industries Nerf Bars emerge as our top recommendation. The combination of proven durability, excellent installation compatibility, strong weight capacity, and consistent owner satisfaction across multiple seasons of use makes this the best choice for most Gladiator owners seeking reliability and value. The Ranch Hand Running Boards serve as an excellent runner-up for owners prioritizing maximum durability and heavy-duty construction and willing to invest in premium materials, particularly those in extreme weather environments.
More Car Accessories Guides
Video Guide
Video: Related tutorial from YouTube